Six questions about the year of Boeing, and what's next

Two of the fatal crashes, and a no-fly zone, and even a stop in production for one of the most popular device. No, no, 2019, was not a good year for Us vliegtui

Six questions about the year of Boeing, and what's next

Two of the fatal crashes, and a no-fly zone, and even a stop in production for one of the most popular device. No, no, 2019, was not a good year for Us vliegtuigmaker Boeing. Six questions about the year of the aircraft where to go from here.

The problems at Boeing doesn't begin in 2019, but will be in October, 2018, when a Lion Air flight, thirteen minutes after the take-off of the java sea wreck. In all, 189 of the passengers was killed. The device, which is at the bottom of the java sea and ends up, it is a 737 MAX for Boeing.

Not long after, in the first quarter of 2019, then crash, with the 737 MAX and to be involved. With this, the crash will come again, 157 of the passengers was killed. Added to a five-month period of time, therefore, 346 people were killed by a crashed 737 MAX. Due to the accidents of the Boeing's device is connecting several countries in the airspace, the 737 MAX.

It has everything to do with the operating system, or the type of the automatic power steering system. Because of the large engine under the 737 MAX, the unit will tend to pull themselves up. The automatic power steering system, the MCAS system, but this should fix the problem.

as of The MCAS system is responsible for using the sensors of the angle of attack of the aircraft is to be measured. As the plane pulled out, it is the duty of the MCAS system in the nose of the aircraft back down.

the two crashes, however, it is from the sensor, the wrong information is passed on to the MCAS system, which is the nose, falsely down, to solve the problem. The pilots are able to do so, provided that they are of the MCAS system is failing, but guess what: they didn't know it is exist. If the pilots that actually had a conscience, they were in the MCAS system will simply be able to put on.

A light at the pilot's warning of a possible problem with the MCAS was not the equipment is installed, as this is when Boeing was where to get paid for it.

So, the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft to be able to while see see see see See also: Why a Boeing 737 MAX, to the land that is taken < / p>

which is Exactly what you would expect when a vliegtuigmaker its main plane is no longer able to get rid of it and pay the bill for the cost of the affected companies: a lot of red figures.

Boeing's sales in the first nine months of 2019, with a 19 per cent decrease compared to the previous year. Also to double the gross borrowings of the company are, almost, between January and september, the 14-billion (about 12.6 billion euro) to over 25 billion us dollars. In July, the move of Boeing to 5.9 billion us dollars, separately, to companies and to suppliers of fuel. The Us investment bank Jefferies, expects that this cost already has been doubled. The company is founded in march of 65 billion u.s. dollars in value will be lost.

also Refer to: Survive, and Boeing's problems with the 737 MAX?

It has everything to do with the American aviation authority the FAA has to make it. The FAA is not convinced that all of the defects in the 737 MAX will once again be restored. Also, it is not surprising that the civil aviation authority there was for so long a time in order for the devices to be approved, the FAA is under a lot of pressure.

On the one hand, the 737 MAX, in aviation, one of the most important export products of the United States of america. There are about a hundred 737 MAX aircraft delivered a total of more than five thousand orders. Thus, there is a strong pressure from the united states to this cashcow in the air to get in.

On the other hand, the civil aviation authority is under pressure due to a recently-published internal report to the FAA. This is to be read, that the 737 MAX aircraft, without the intervention of the FAA, however, each and every two to three years to be able to lock up that the risk is a lot bigger than Boeing has ever reported to have had. The FAA knew, therefore, that the device is relatively insecure), was the first to crash in October 2018. It has an independent status from the FAA is a good selection.

in The parking lot at the Boeing plant, which is quite full. (Photo: Reuters)

Wait until the FAA and Boeing the green light to get back to the 737 MAX to fly off. The cost in the meantime, the press was decided by the vliegtuigmaker on Monday that production of the 737 MAX is on a provisional basis, came to a halt. Boeing lost out, according to industry analysts, about $ 2 billion a month on the phone. Due to the production process cut in half, which cost, according to the same analysts.

in Addition, it plays also a role as Boeing's plant in Renton, but 737 MAX aircraft remained in production as they no longer were, so there was a lot ruimtetekort. Boeing has had to be because of this, even a lots of workers to sacrifice to get the aircraft home.

you can Click the images to see how the incompleteness of the 737 MAX fuselages in a row at the Boeing factory in the Us city of Wichita. (Photo: Reuters)

it's hard to say. Analysts expect that the unit will be in February, again considered secure and, American airlines, Southwest Airlines, and American Airlines is launching the device in april, and to be able to use it. United Airlines is expected to be the 737 MAX, even back in June, and to be able to use it.

now, The expectations are sliding, however, it is always on, so gambled and United Airlines, for example, the first on July of last year, as the return date and thought, " Boeing "within a few weeks after the second crash, to be able to fly. These predictions have, so far, not much has been. One thing is for sure: the ball is in the FAA.

Date Of Update: 28 December 2019, 13:01
NEXT NEWS