Wall-to-wall criticism of Hoekstra's restructuring plans as well as Tax and customs administration

Several parties on Tuesday, during a debate in the house of questions with respect to the plan of a christian democrat minister Wopke Hoekstra (Finance) to the Tax and customs administration and to cut. Not only the opposition but also the coalition parties, the VVD, D66 and ChristenUnie (christianunion) are wondering why, Hoekstra has chosen to cut from the organization. Also, the internet is of critical importance.

Hoekstra, who, after the resignation of the secretary of state, That, Quickly, the portfolio will temporarily be taking over, announced, recently, the Tax authority has to be rigorously reconstructed.

The service will be cut up into three services: income Tax, Fees and Customs, each with its own official top, and the two secretaries of state.
Room highlights the risks in the rapid reorganization of
Several members of parliament are essentially in the debate on the report from which it appears that a rapid separation of the Charges, and the tax portion of the Tax and customs administration is a risk for the continuity of the provision of services to the citizens. In addition, the child care allowance are struggling with the tax authority for years, with a large number of ict-related problems, and recruitment.

Henk Nijboer (PvdA) asked Hoekstra to the Tax and customs administration, as quickly to want to reorganize, even prior to the replacement of the Fast in the first place. GroenLinks Member of parliament, Bart Snels and called the plan "misguided" and that the government's move should be reversed.

it is Notable that the coalition has questions to."Why aren't there more cooks in the kitchen?" the wild party of people Helma Lodders know about it. Steven van Weyenberg (D66): "Who is responsible for the it? And if the international tax help line:? Why was this form chosen?" Also, a CDA Member of parliament Pieter Omtzigt proved to be critical. He wants the work, and the fulfillment of the responsibilities are subject to change.

for example, If it is to the liberal party (VVD), the Dutch political party D66 and the christian union, but the prime minister is also, in the future, be involved in the three departments and, in particular, in the case of the childcare allowance.

According to Hoekstra, the "hoofdcontouren clear, and the full range of responsibilities and the distribution of well-known, after the appointment of the new secretary of state. He said that he was "absolutely" concerned the Tax and customs administration, and the management of the opvangtoeslagfraude.

Appreciation for the visit of mark Rutte, the Chamber remains in a critical

The Room held a debate on Tuesday with prime minister Mark Rutte in the netherlands, and Hoekstra, on the plans, and the management of the kinderopvangtoeslagaffaire.

In the Room sounded like a broad appreciation for the event and 200 injured parents, where New and Hoekstra, on Monday at present. To his own words, " had Won several times as a single tear to fall when you hear the stories of their parents.

at the same time, continued to be in the Room is critical. If asked, Finis, and Omtzigt to be a clarification of the respective ministerial committee, which includes the hard-fraudeaanpak will be discussed. Prime minister mark Rutte has served as chairman of the committee.

According to the prime minister, the hard-nosed fraudeaanpak is never discussed. It is also, according to Won't be back to find out exactly when, and by whom, is it decided at any time by going to the out of hand fraudejacht.

there's nothing to be found, said Omtzigt "scary". "What is in it for the government. The government does everything for its citizens, but when the government makes a decision, with serious consequences for the general public, can not be restored."

Prime minister mark Rutte said it again to see what can be found there, and using a time line to come up.
Room deadline for reports to the Minister
in Addition to be in the Room to ensure that it is the only thing that may be thousands of affected parents will get something out of it, is that it as soon as possible, to be compensated for the material and non-material damage.

So the SP there is Renske Leijten is that of the Tax authorities, the statute of limitations, release, so that parents are not the judge of their right to retrieve it.

the Order of the steps in order to be able to make repeated and Hoekstra, which is the study of the european commission, the Minister remains to be seen. That was last month and the results are present, but for some strange reason, the presentation of a one month suspended.

in The Room and wanted to know if the research that the appearance has been completed. Also, the examination of possible ethnic profiling by the Dutch Tax authorities on the part of parents allow for it. Hoekstra had not known about it, but stressed that the Dutch government is doing everything to help the parents to quickly, but in a very gentle way, to help.

In the toeslagenaffaire put up with the Tax and customs administration, the opvangtoeslag where the parents have a right to be, had, in the majority of cases it is undeserved, stop, and continued for tens of thousands of dollars, while there is no evidence of fraud. Thousands of parents got into financial trouble.

as with Both the Second Chamber and the government, it is rather agreed that the toeslagenstelsel at the last minute should be. However, it may take several years before a new system is, it is intended that the works proposed for the formation on the table.